ARCC Life  

ARCC Board
President's Messages
Join
Identity
Activities
Online News
ARCC News 2012 ARCC News 2013 ARCC News 2014 ARCC News 2015 ARCC News 2016 ARCC News 2017
25 January 2017 Changing the Conversation (170509) Celebrating More Than 50 Years (170509) Conscience-Based Moral Judgments (170509) Dignitaries Humanae (170509) False Views on Jesus' Views on Divorce (170509) Mission and Human Rights (170509) Jesus and the Ordination of Women (170516) 29 May 2017 How much of Church Doctrine do we really believe? (170602) Trump Pulls Out of Paris Agreement (170602) 05 June 2017 Thoughts on Religious Vocations: An Open Letter to Pope Francis (170605) I can't get the institutional church out of my system (170618) 25 June 2017 Just War? Enough Already (170703) What would Teilhard say? Evolve or be annihilated (170710) Fifteenth Sunday in Ordinary Time (170719) Religion's Wax Nose (170726) American Civil Religion (170731) A Heresy of the Times (170807) Cardinal Calls for Global Church (170818) The Price of Being a Prophet (170821) The Implosion of the Roman Catholic Church (170902) Reflection on Racism in America (170913) Who am I? Where am I going? (170918) One Priest's Hopes for the Mass Translation (170925) The Edge of the Inside (171002) Selective Christianity (171016) Theology at the Cutting Edge: Healing the Political and Social Divide in America (171016) Resisting Islamophobia Is The Catholic Thing To Do. (171023) It Started With a Letter to the Archbishop (171030) Why Do We Still Tolerate Mass Stipends? (171106) Their Cross to Bear: Catholic Women Told to Forgive (171113) Papal loyalists become dissidents (171120) Echoes of Theocracy (171127) Will Pope Francis Remove the 'Warning'? (171204) Gumbleton on Nuclear Deterrence (071211) The Scandal of the 2011 Missal (171218)
ARCC News 2018 Changing Power Relationships
ArCC
ARCC-ive

   

Time for a Bonfire of Their Vanities? (20180122)

Time for a Bonfire of the Vanities?

Details

Contemporary Catholic Belief and Action

IS IT TIME FOR THE BISHOPS TO MAKE A
'BONFIRE OF THEIR VANITIES'?

Clifford Longley
 
Your Eminences, Your Graces, My Lords - this Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, how about a joint demonstration of unity in humility? Pope Francis has ruled that the title Monsignor (literally "My Lord") should no longer be awarded to priests under the age of 65. He opposed the use of all such titles by his clergy when he was Archbishop of Buenos Aires. Isn't it time you went the whole hog, and got rid of every last trace of all that feudal pomposity? It is sending precisely the wrong message. 
In both the Church of England and the Roman Catholic Church, archbishops are regarded as the equivalent to dukes, and so, like dukes, are entitled to be addressed as "Your Grace". Bishops, likewise, are regarded as equivalent to the rank of an earl or baron, and so are entitled to be addressed as "My Lord". 
The "correct" style of address for an archbishop is "the Most Reverend" and for a bishop, "the Right Reverend". Ordinary priests are "the Reverend", either "Reverend Mr" or "Reverend Father". The Church of England also has "the Very Reverend" for archdeacons and the like, but I haven't come across that usage in the Catholic Church. But isn't it time we recognised that all this is an out-of-date piece of nonsense? Why should ordained clergy be automatically revered? I am sure it makes them uncomfortable if they think about.
An ecumenical act of professional renunciation by down-sizing forms of addresses and titles would draw attention to the coming Kingdom of Heaven where the first will be last and the last first. "Mr" is an adequate form of address for the clergy, however senior. 
There is no problem with Archbishop Smith, Bishop Jones or Dean Brown, where appropriate. And Cardinal Jackson is sufficient. A cardinal may or may not be eminent, but we cannot assume it. Cardinal Hume once told me he had the utmost difficulty adjusting to being addressed as Your Eminence and it made him feel hypocritical. The designation "Prince of the Church" belongs in the history books of the "Ancien RĂ©gime".
I am in two minds about the Pope's own title of Holy Father, though it is hardly used any more in the mass media. One would hope a Pope would be holy, though it seems strange to regard that description as ex-officio. Attaching that title to the Borgia Pope Alexander VI does raise a few problems. I doubt that was what his illegitimate children (or his mistress) called him.
There is no need to object to "Father", shortened to "Fr", though in Matthew 23:9 Jesus is reported to have told his disciples "Call no man father, as you already have a father in heaven." But he was manifestly not talking about ecclesiastical titles, and in any case, no-one who calls a priest "Father" is mistaking him for their biological male parent, which is what Jesus was trying to convey. (Except in those rare cases where they really are, see Borgias above.)
This may seem trivial, but symbols matter. A church deeply attached to an outdated, indeed mediaeval, class system is easily misunderstood as wanting to retain these titles as signs of social privilege, an ecclesiastical version of Upstairs Downstairs. Growing inequality is a stain on modern societies, and is not only measured in economic terms. How does the Church attack inequality, when it has built it into its own internal language? It is one of the many unconscious pillars of the pervasive culture of clericalism.
So what would it take for the House of Bishops of the Church of England, say, to make a proposal to their equivalents in the Bishops' Conference of England and Wales - or vice versa - for a once-for-all bonfire of their spiritual vanities? No more honorific Lords, Graces, Mosts, Rights or Verys. Just Christians, doing their best.
URL
   
© ARCC